US and Japan revise Okinawa agreement
WASHINGTON, April 26 – The US and Japan announced on Thursday a revised agreement on streamlining US military presence on Okinawa that will shift 9,000 marines from the southern Japanese island to Guam and other Asia-Pacific sites.
The new plan, unveiled days before Yoshihiko Noda, Japanese prime minister, meets President Barack Obama in Washington, helps the allies work around the central but still-unresolved dispute over moving the Futenma air base from a crowded part of Okinawa to a new site that has vexed relations for years.
“I am very pleased that, after many years, we have reached this important agreement and plan of action.
I applaud the hard work and effort that went into crafting it,” said Leon Panetta, US defence secretary.
“Japan is not just a close ally, but also a close friend.”
Under the agreement, 9,000 US marines will be relocated. Five thousand will go to Guam and the rest to other sites such as Hawaii and Australia, said a joint US-Japanese statement.
The updated version of a long-delayed 2006 plan was needed to achieve “a US force posture in the Asia-Pacific region that is more geographically distributed, operationally resilient and politically sustainable”, the statement said.
Snags over Okinawa had raised questions about the viability of the Obama administration’s strategy of shifting US forces from other regions to the Asia-Pacific to deal with nuclear sabre-rattling by North Korea, the rapid military build-up of China and territorial disputes in the South China Sea.
Friction over US bases intensified after the 1995 gang rape of a Japanese schoolgirl by US servicemen. The case sparked widespread protests by Okinawans, who had long resented the American presence due to crime, noise and deadly accidents.
There are about 47,000 US troops in Japan under a 1960 bilateral security treaty.
Okinawa, occupied by the US from 1945-72, accounts for less than 1 per cent of Japan’s total land but hosts three-quarters of the US military facilities in the country in terms of land area.
“This has been ... bogged down for years, but now we have been able to come up with a new approach de-linking the Futenma relocation from other elements, like moving out marine forces to Guam and returning some parts of Okinawa,” said Ichiro Fujisaki, Japan’s ambassador to the US.
“Things are going to start moving,” he told a gathering in Washington.
Kurt Campbell, assistant secretary of state for East Asian and Pacific Affairs, said the deal was discussed widely with US lawmakers, who had refused to fund the overhaul on Okinawa until the Futenma deadlock was resolved and the administration fully explained how the move would fit overall US strategy.
“We think it breaks a very long stalemate ... that has plagued our politics, that has clogged both of our systems,” said Mr Campbell.
A senior State Department official said: “This is really a key component of our strategic rebalancing toward the Asia-Pacific region.”
The new policy has also entailed closer US military ties with the Philippines, Australia and Singapore.
The agreement includes a $3.1bn cash commitment from Japan for the move to Guam as well as for developing joint training ranges on Guam and on Tinian and Pagan in the US-controlled Northern Mariana Islands.
The previous agreement on the move to Guam had Japan providing $6.1bn in support, with $2.8bn in cash and the rest in financing arrangements. The two sides agreed to limit that to $3.1bn from Japan because of the smaller footprint the marines will have in Guam.
Mr Campbell acknowledged that more work needed to be done, including finding a replacement for Futenma.
Proposed replacement sites for Futenma on the subtropical island that lies between Japan’s main islands and Taiwan have met strong local opposition. This has coincided with political disarray in Tokyo, with six prime ministers in six years.
“Does this agreement answer every question? It does not. Is there more programmatic and technical work that is necessary? Yes,” said Mr Campbell.
“But at a fundamental level, we think this agreement moves the ball very substantially down the field in a way that no one would have anticipated a few months ago,” he said.
Separating the move to Guam from the Futenma issue frees up the allies to devote work more on cybersecurity, space, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance operations and ballistic missile defence, said a senior official from US defence department.
Senators Carl Levin, John McCain and Jim Webb – top members of the US Senate Armed Services Committee who had frozen Okinawa funding until their budgetary and strategic questions were answered – said some of their concerns had been addressed.
“We still have many questions about the specific details of this statement and its implications for our force posture in the Asia-Pacific region,” they said in a statement, which also vowed to keep working on “a mutually beneficial, militarily effective and fiscally sustainable agreement” on Okinawa and Guam.
from http://www.ft.com
WASHINGTON, April 26 – The US and Japan announced on Thursday a revised agreement on streamlining US military presence on Okinawa that will shift 9,000 marines from the southern Japanese island to Guam and other Asia-Pacific sites.
The new plan, unveiled days before Yoshihiko Noda, Japanese prime minister, meets President Barack Obama in Washington, helps the allies work around the central but still-unresolved dispute over moving the Futenma air base from a crowded part of Okinawa to a new site that has vexed relations for years.
“I am very pleased that, after many years, we have reached this important agreement and plan of action.
I applaud the hard work and effort that went into crafting it,” said Leon Panetta, US defence secretary.
“Japan is not just a close ally, but also a close friend.”
Under the agreement, 9,000 US marines will be relocated. Five thousand will go to Guam and the rest to other sites such as Hawaii and Australia, said a joint US-Japanese statement.
The updated version of a long-delayed 2006 plan was needed to achieve “a US force posture in the Asia-Pacific region that is more geographically distributed, operationally resilient and politically sustainable”, the statement said.
Snags over Okinawa had raised questions about the viability of the Obama administration’s strategy of shifting US forces from other regions to the Asia-Pacific to deal with nuclear sabre-rattling by North Korea, the rapid military build-up of China and territorial disputes in the South China Sea.
Friction over US bases intensified after the 1995 gang rape of a Japanese schoolgirl by US servicemen. The case sparked widespread protests by Okinawans, who had long resented the American presence due to crime, noise and deadly accidents.
There are about 47,000 US troops in Japan under a 1960 bilateral security treaty.
Okinawa, occupied by the US from 1945-72, accounts for less than 1 per cent of Japan’s total land but hosts three-quarters of the US military facilities in the country in terms of land area.
“This has been ... bogged down for years, but now we have been able to come up with a new approach de-linking the Futenma relocation from other elements, like moving out marine forces to Guam and returning some parts of Okinawa,” said Ichiro Fujisaki, Japan’s ambassador to the US.
“Things are going to start moving,” he told a gathering in Washington.
Kurt Campbell, assistant secretary of state for East Asian and Pacific Affairs, said the deal was discussed widely with US lawmakers, who had refused to fund the overhaul on Okinawa until the Futenma deadlock was resolved and the administration fully explained how the move would fit overall US strategy.
“We think it breaks a very long stalemate ... that has plagued our politics, that has clogged both of our systems,” said Mr Campbell.
A senior State Department official said: “This is really a key component of our strategic rebalancing toward the Asia-Pacific region.”
The new policy has also entailed closer US military ties with the Philippines, Australia and Singapore.
The agreement includes a $3.1bn cash commitment from Japan for the move to Guam as well as for developing joint training ranges on Guam and on Tinian and Pagan in the US-controlled Northern Mariana Islands.
The previous agreement on the move to Guam had Japan providing $6.1bn in support, with $2.8bn in cash and the rest in financing arrangements. The two sides agreed to limit that to $3.1bn from Japan because of the smaller footprint the marines will have in Guam.
Mr Campbell acknowledged that more work needed to be done, including finding a replacement for Futenma.
Proposed replacement sites for Futenma on the subtropical island that lies between Japan’s main islands and Taiwan have met strong local opposition. This has coincided with political disarray in Tokyo, with six prime ministers in six years.
“Does this agreement answer every question? It does not. Is there more programmatic and technical work that is necessary? Yes,” said Mr Campbell.
“But at a fundamental level, we think this agreement moves the ball very substantially down the field in a way that no one would have anticipated a few months ago,” he said.
Separating the move to Guam from the Futenma issue frees up the allies to devote work more on cybersecurity, space, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance operations and ballistic missile defence, said a senior official from US defence department.
Senators Carl Levin, John McCain and Jim Webb – top members of the US Senate Armed Services Committee who had frozen Okinawa funding until their budgetary and strategic questions were answered – said some of their concerns had been addressed.
“We still have many questions about the specific details of this statement and its implications for our force posture in the Asia-Pacific region,” they said in a statement, which also vowed to keep working on “a mutually beneficial, militarily effective and fiscally sustainable agreement” on Okinawa and Guam.
from http://www.ft.com
No comments:
Post a Comment